Towards an Impure Poetry

ef173f24993d487a0bda7e0d6e1c0f9e

If you’re looking for a useful comparison in literature then know scriptwriting and narrative film most closely resemble poetry.

Walter Mosley

Walter told me this a few weeks ago at the Screenwriters Lab and you know what? I think he’s right.

I’ve been pondering it a lot lately as I begin rewriting my feature draft.

Recently, I started thinking about it more deeply after I got an email from someone, a poet, who saw one of my shorts and she got me thinking about what Walter may have actually meant.

Walk with me here…

I think he meant poetry is best when concise (even if it’s long it’s confined to a strong theme or image). The poet decides what’s necessary to convey the thought, mood or emotion they’re sharing and don’t burden the piece with anything superfluous (in a poem if you don’t “kill your babies” you’ll kill the poem). Also, they (hopefully) wrap the writing around a strong theme, setting, character or image.

How is this any different than strong screenwriting?

Yeah, it isn’t.

Good, we agree (you, Walter and I).

So as I dive back into my own writing I’d like to share with you one of my favorite (manifesto) pieces about poetry or any creative endeavor really.

Hope it hits you as hard as it still hits me. Enjoy and read deep…

Towards an Impure Poetry

by Pablo Neruda

“It is good, at certain hours of the day and night, to look closely at the world of objects at rest. Wheels that have crossed long, dusty distances with their mineral and vegetable burdens, sacks from the coal bins, barrels, and baskets, handles and hafts for the carpenter’s tool chest.

From them flow the contacts of man with the earth, like a text for all troubled lyricists. The used surfaces of things, the wear that the hands give to things, the air, tragic at times, pathetic at others, of such things—all lend a curious attractiveness to the reality of the world that should not be under-prized.

In them one sees the confused impurity of the human condition, the massing of things, the use and disuse of substance, footprints and fingerprints, the abiding presence of the human engulfing all artifacts, inside and out.

Let that be the poetry we search for: worn with the hand’s obligations, as by acids, steeped in sweat and in smoke, smelling of the lilies and urine, spattered diversely by the trades that we live by, inside the law or beyond it.

A poetry impure as the clothing we wear, or our bodies, soup-stained, soiled with our shameful behavior, our wrinkles and vigils and dreams, observations and prophecies, declarations of loathing and love, idylls and beasts, the shocks of encounter, political loyalties, denials and doubts, affirmations and taxes.

The holy canons of madrigal, the mandates of touch, smell, taste, sight, hearing, the passion for justice, sexual desire, the sea sounding—willfully rejecting and accepting nothing: the deep penetration of things in the transports of love, a consummate poetry soiled by the pigeon’s claw, ice-marked and tooth-marked, bitten delicately with our sweat-drops and usage, perhaps.

Till the instrument so restlessly played yields us the comfort of its surfaces, and the woods show the knottiest suavities shaped by the pride of the tool. Blossom and water and wheat kernel share one precious consistency: the sumptuous appeal of the tactile.

Let no one forget them. Melancholy, old mawkishness impure and unflawed, fruits of a fabulous species lost to the memory, cast away in a frenzy’s abandonment—moonlight, the swan in the gathering darkness, all hackneyed endearments: surely that is the poet’s concern, essential and absolute.

Those who shun the “bad taste” of things will fall flat on the ice.”

Leave a Comment

You know what would be really cool? If you left me a comment— Go ahead...